Designers Anonymous
I've received SO much mail and even phone calls about my post a few days ago alluding to the Interweave Knits contract that I chose not to sign.
Most of the mail was from other designers who have been - well - afraid to raise their voices about this because they don't want to be perceived as 'trouble makers' by the powers that be - but agree that they don't like the way the rules are being drawn out.
Every designer who has written to me in the past weeks has agreed with my position to not sign the contract as it stands, and I'm saddened that so many of them choose not to make their voice heard. It's dreadful to give away so much power - the power of our voice - by not using it. Or weakening it by using it anonymously.
All we have as designers is our intelligence; this manifests itself as design savvy, knitting skill and marketing ability. WE OWN THE MEANS TO OUR PRODUCTION, but we give it away through fear.
Shameless
It's been long implied that there's something immodest or self-aggrandizing about putting ourselves forward. But if we don't do so, we're consistently putting ourselves in a position to be taken advantage of by the market in general, and industry publications specifically. This may be because knit/crochet design is a career path chosen by more women than men - who knows?
Just about every magazine and editor I've dealt with is fair, and tries to be supportive and helpful of designers. But they are running a business. They are trying to earn as much money off of our work as they can, which is fair - god's speed to them!
Why it's considered unseemly for us as designers to do the same - with our own hard work - is beyond me, but there it is.
Self Defeat from Within
I've read some designers criticize others for aggressive marketing. There's a certain self-righteous, judgemental quality to this type of criticism, which has been used to keep folks down, to reign in mavericks.
This attitude's been found throughout history, especially directed to "uppity" folks who don't know their place and aren't part of the power elite (women, minorities, the poor.)
It's especially destructive when it comes from within a group we'd like to believe would be most supportive.
We need to support each other so that we can stand up and say to publishers;
Unite
I guess what I'm trying to say is that if we don't stand together, we are our own worse enemy.
If we refuse to tell an editor how we feel about this because we're afraid we'll be black-balled, then we are asking others to stand up for us.
And I do NOT think will happen, I had a pleasant, private conversation on the phone with IK last week regarding my previous blog post, and I don't anticipate any negative backlash because of it.
If you are a designer and are not speaking out because you believe those who speak out will lose design opportunities, as yourself this:
A Note About AKD
I've been hesitant to join the AKD (Association of Knitwear Designers) I'd be VERY interested in hearing from AKD members about what they perceive as the benefits of membership, and whether the membership is comfortable confronting some of these financial issues affecting designers. My earlier feeling was that they weren't - but if that's changing or if I was mistaken, I'd love to know about it (and join!)
Designers Union?
Wouldn't it be great to have a Guild - a Union - that would help us find group health insurance, stand up for member designers who have had their copyright infringed upon, and create a designer and teacher friendly basic contract that we could use as a benchmark for negotiating our own contracts? Or even help to develop a framework to deal with online rights to our published patterns?
Perhaps we're too diverse a group, but I don't think so. We're no more diverse than Costume & Set Designers, and I'm a (currently inactive) member of USA 629.
Here's one example of why we need a Union for Knit/Crochet Designers & Teachers:
Earlier this year I was asked to teach at a venue which only wanted to pay a portion of my airfare, didn't want to pay for a private room (I would have to share a room, AND teach a full class load), and expected up to 9 hours of 'free face time' where I would interact with all of the workshop participants with no compensation (and very little time to rest.)
I'm happy to give a nice amount of time to a group, but a girl's gotta rest if she's going to teach (and it's precious difficult to rest with a roommate - at least it is for me...)
When I demurred, I was told by the organizers, "Well, X and Y and Z (big name knit teachers) are all coming to teach, they're okay with the pay..!"
I found myself thinking, "I don't know what X, Y & Z's situations are, but this is a bad deal whereby the organizers are well paid and the instructors are treated like livestock."
Somehow I don't think X, Y and Z would be happy that their names were being used to justify the wretched compensation and travel reimbursement being offered.
And THAT is what a union is for. To prevent us from being played against each other, to make it easier for us to stand up with - and for - each other.
Most of the mail was from other designers who have been - well - afraid to raise their voices about this because they don't want to be perceived as 'trouble makers' by the powers that be - but agree that they don't like the way the rules are being drawn out.
Every designer who has written to me in the past weeks has agreed with my position to not sign the contract as it stands, and I'm saddened that so many of them choose not to make their voice heard. It's dreadful to give away so much power - the power of our voice - by not using it. Or weakening it by using it anonymously.
All we have as designers is our intelligence; this manifests itself as design savvy, knitting skill and marketing ability. WE OWN THE MEANS TO OUR PRODUCTION, but we give it away through fear.
- Design Savvy - This is self-explanatory. We have different skills and talents with yarn, and we create sweaters and patterns based on individual inspirations.
- Skill - You don't have to knit or crochet to be a knit/crochet designer, but it's hard to be a good one without those skills.
You don't have to do calisthenics with yarn to create a wonderful design, but it does help to have a large bag of tricks to draw from when trying to solve certain problems in a design. - Marketing Ability - Perhaps the most maligned and misunderstood of our skill set, this can be the most important tool we have, at least if we want to earn a living doing this.
It's just too damned easy to say, "Oh, I can't market myself!" You must.
Even if your way of doing that is finding someone who can market you, you MUST do something to own this aspect of your career.
Authors are expected to market their own books now; we need to do this, too.
Shameless
It's been long implied that there's something immodest or self-aggrandizing about putting ourselves forward. But if we don't do so, we're consistently putting ourselves in a position to be taken advantage of by the market in general, and industry publications specifically. This may be because knit/crochet design is a career path chosen by more women than men - who knows?
Just about every magazine and editor I've dealt with is fair, and tries to be supportive and helpful of designers. But they are running a business. They are trying to earn as much money off of our work as they can, which is fair - god's speed to them!
Why it's considered unseemly for us as designers to do the same - with our own hard work - is beyond me, but there it is.
Self Defeat from Within
I've read some designers criticize others for aggressive marketing. There's a certain self-righteous, judgemental quality to this type of criticism, which has been used to keep folks down, to reign in mavericks.
This attitude's been found throughout history, especially directed to "uppity" folks who don't know their place and aren't part of the power elite (women, minorities, the poor.)
It's especially destructive when it comes from within a group we'd like to believe would be most supportive.
We need to support each other so that we can stand up and say to publishers;
"My work is worth $X, I own the rights to it, and if you pay me you can publish it in your magazine ONE TIME.
If you want to use if after that, you'll have to re-negotiate with me and pay me what it's worth!"
Unite
I guess what I'm trying to say is that if we don't stand together, we are our own worse enemy.
If we refuse to tell an editor how we feel about this because we're afraid we'll be black-balled, then we are asking others to stand up for us.
And I do NOT think will happen, I had a pleasant, private conversation on the phone with IK last week regarding my previous blog post, and I don't anticipate any negative backlash because of it.
If you are a designer and are not speaking out because you believe those who speak out will lose design opportunities, as yourself this:
Are you comfortable taking advantage of those same opportunities you believe someone has lost because they were vocal?We are as strong as we choose to be.
Are you able to see that by not visibly standing with those of us who are seeking a fair deal for ALL designers, you may be weakening your own position?
A Note About AKD
I've been hesitant to join the AKD (Association of Knitwear Designers) I'd be VERY interested in hearing from AKD members about what they perceive as the benefits of membership, and whether the membership is comfortable confronting some of these financial issues affecting designers. My earlier feeling was that they weren't - but if that's changing or if I was mistaken, I'd love to know about it (and join!)
Designers Union?
Wouldn't it be great to have a Guild - a Union - that would help us find group health insurance, stand up for member designers who have had their copyright infringed upon, and create a designer and teacher friendly basic contract that we could use as a benchmark for negotiating our own contracts? Or even help to develop a framework to deal with online rights to our published patterns?
Perhaps we're too diverse a group, but I don't think so. We're no more diverse than Costume & Set Designers, and I'm a (currently inactive) member of USA 629.
Here's one example of why we need a Union for Knit/Crochet Designers & Teachers:
Earlier this year I was asked to teach at a venue which only wanted to pay a portion of my airfare, didn't want to pay for a private room (I would have to share a room, AND teach a full class load), and expected up to 9 hours of 'free face time' where I would interact with all of the workshop participants with no compensation (and very little time to rest.)
I'm happy to give a nice amount of time to a group, but a girl's gotta rest if she's going to teach (and it's precious difficult to rest with a roommate - at least it is for me...)
When I demurred, I was told by the organizers, "Well, X and Y and Z (big name knit teachers) are all coming to teach, they're okay with the pay..!"
I found myself thinking, "I don't know what X, Y & Z's situations are, but this is a bad deal whereby the organizers are well paid and the instructors are treated like livestock."
Somehow I don't think X, Y and Z would be happy that their names were being used to justify the wretched compensation and travel reimbursement being offered.
And THAT is what a union is for. To prevent us from being played against each other, to make it easier for us to stand up with - and for - each other.
I welcome your comments - keep it nice.
Remember that negative comments about individual publishers on my blog reflect back onto me.
Remember that negative comments about individual publishers on my blog reflect back onto me.







34 Comments:
Well, you do have a leg to stand on...if you all stood on your legs....imagine... no designers...no sweater etc. designs...no need for magazines or books... no need for anyone else in the business really...how many knitters knit from scratch...makes me think of the screen writers problems...you have my support...I took 2 of your classes and they were money well spent .
This is a great post, and I think you're doing a good thing by speaking out about these issues in designing.
About AKD-- Let's address the big question first. AKD has recently incorporated as a non-profit, has a whole new board in charge, and of course, is only as powerful as its members. This is a volunteer organization with a long and important history, and many of us have very big dreams for where it can go. The membership fee is low, and for an established professional designer with multiple designs, the jurying process is easy. It offers a newsletter, educational opportunities for designers, opportunities for networking and promotion, as well as an extensive number of contacts within the industry.
As an even more tangible plus for designers, AKD has things like an online membership forum where members can post "Calls for Submissions" as we get them. Imagine the increased submission opportunities inherent in that!
Regarding financial issues--Recently, AKD did a member survey where people gave information about what average pay they were getting per design, with very specific details. This was broken down into categories, with direct questions about contracts, yarn companies, magazines, and other publishing opportunities. For me, at least, it helped to know exactly what everyone was earning for the same sort of garment: men's sweater, baby sweater, whatever. It also created an anonymous "answer" regarding earning power, what copyrights the designers gave away, etc. Is this an organized bargaining tool? Maybe not, but it certainly enables me to know what to ask for in terms of payment in the future.
Can AKD perhaps be the "Designers Guild" of the future? If we create it to fit our needs, there's no reason why not...and it's far easier to start with an already established non-profit organization with 80 members. Please, consider joining us as we forge this new path! We're excited to have others participate as we dream about our new directions!
Joanne Seiff, board member of AKD
I couldn't agree more and its inspiring to see you speak up. I've worked as a freelance creative professional and I know the frustrations of trying to market ideas and concepts...non-tangible stuff. It can be a real nightmare to be compensated fairly.
Perhaps I'm opening up a can of worms here but, I wonder if feminism plays a role at all. If a majority of our knitwear designers these days are women (and I know that's changing so I'm not trying to generalize)...and the idea some have that this trade falls under "women's work"...are knitwear designers expected to do their work quietly, play nice, and share?
As opposed to standing strong, being ambitious, competing in the market and getting paid what they're worth? Just as any person would do in a typically male dominated trade? Could there be a bit of a double standard here of sorts?
I think one great way to combat this indifference is to use the word "trade" instead of "craft". It has a great ripple effect on a whole fiber "industry". So to me, it isn't just a craft or turning a hobby into cash.
It's a real trade, which alot of other jobs and careers depend on. It deserves more respect than it gets for sure!
What a thoughtful post. And thought-provoking as well.
I have a few (as yet unpublished) sock designs up my sleeve and the current contract discussion in blogland has me wondering if I even want to submit them anyplace.
If the current contracts being offered by the big-time publishers are (apparently) non-negotiable, and they are taking away all future rights of the designer, even if the designer "retains copyright", it makes me hesitant to even jump in.
These discussions have been very revealing of the inner workings of publishing. Any tips for a rookie designer?
I really enjoy hearing about the business side of designing. It gives a glimpse into the other side of the world.
Most artists have trouble marketing themselves, and that's what knit/crochet designers are! Too many people under value their product because they are afraid of
A. Not making sales
B. Not being competitive
and C. Not appreciating their own skill in creating a work of art.
It takes guts to say, "No my work is worth what I priced it. I will not discount it." The web has helped many artists sell more without institutional backing.
Good luck with your efforts!
If you and other designers do not stand up for yourselves and your expertise, who will?!
Subscribers should also let magazines, such as IK know that they support their designers - without you, we are left with nothing new and fresh to challenge us.
As someone who has a family business in the retail yarn trade for 34 years, I know the frustration of legitimizing what we do and being compensated properly. If you compute the hours spent on creating a design or doing finishing work on customers work, you are sadly underpaid.
It is clearly a labor of love, and something we feel strongly should be passed on to others; however, it is time that this industry gets up to speed on the real world and fair compensation.
Thanks for having the courage to speak out - I, for one, will be writing a letter to IK.
Great post, Annie.
Although I have belonged to what was first PKDG (The Professional Knitwear Designers Guild), then AKD (Association of Knitwear Designers)since 2000,shortly after I published my book, I sometimes questioned why I belonged. But, for the $25.00 membership fee I decided it was worth being a member.
Then, I decided it was time to become active. I agreed to be on a committee to draft one amendment to the bylaws. A quick review of the bylaws and standing rules convinced me that some changes were necessary. I ended up devoting many hours to drafting new bylaws, became a short-term member of the governing board of AKD, drafted the Article of Incorporation, and then served an Interim Board member of AKD, Inc.
On November 1, 2007 AKD, Inc. elected the first Board of Directors of this not-for-profit corporation. AKD, Inc.is now off and running. New committees are currently working on a number of areas including professional development and education. One of the major areas I am interested in is helping designer to understand contracts, so I volunteered for the Education Committee. Another area is understanding how to run a business and to see AKD, Inc. operate as an active professional business, so I volunteered for the Finance Committee.
AKD, Inc. has some great members with lots of diverse interests and abilities. I'm really looking forward to seeing what the future brings for AKD, Inc. and its members.
Personally, I do not believe that a union is the answer. I do believe that joining together in a professional organization is a great beginning to getting the voice of designers heard.
Annie, I urge you to apply for membership in AKD, Inc. and to become an active and involved member. You have lots of talents that can assist AKD, Inc. and its individual members.
Thanks again for your great discussion.
Myrna A.I. Stahman, dba Rocking Chair Press, publisher of "Stahman's Shawls and Scarves" and retired attorney
Marie,
A letter would be great (and thank you for the time you and your family have put into the fiber world!)
But I do want to make it clear that Interweave is the only publishing venue to take this topic on in such a public way - and I respect them for it - and IK has a LONG history of being VERY fair with designers.
I wouldn't like them to get a lot of negative reaction because they are in the forefront of this issue - they're among the top magazines in the way they treat their contributors and the respect they pay to their readers.
If I were you, I'd contact X, Y & Z designers and see if they REALLY agreed to the same contract terms that the organizers said they did!
Marcia
This is just more thoughts regarding the cut for having your pattern published online with Knitting Daily...
On one hand, having your pattern featured does give you publicity and make people aware that you're out there. If they like your design, they can check out more of your designs, including books you've written. So a lower fee might be justified by the publicity/marketing benefit you would get on account of being featured.
On the other hand, it's like music: if you can download just the song you want, why buy the entire CD? If you can get a designers pattern for free, why buy their book? Or am I the only consumer who thinks that way? With all the free patterns online, one might never need to buy a knitting book in this day in age. At the same time, it wets your appetite for all the other great stuff out there and you see other patterns (that you must buy) and you can spend way more than you ever could had you not realized these things even existed. The internet can be a two-edged sword sometimes.
Economics is a very grey science - there is no black and white.
Shall we change your name to Annie Rae?
Annie, thank you for speaking up for us all. We do need to be strong and each speak up for ourselves. AKD is one place where we can hash out our designer difficulties and become more educated about our industry and our chosen profession. I'll admit that AKD had a somewhat dormant spell, but we have experienced a huge revitalization over the past year. We are moving toward being the place where designers can interact and learn how to run their businesses well, and as a group we aim to become a major voice in the industry. You should give us another look and consider becoming a member. Together we can stamp out this fear designers have that our work won't be accepted if we push back and demand to be compensated.
Speaking out is fine, but IWK may well decide to use designs from other, more compliant, designers in the future. To my mind, the problem with getting paid for the amount of time and effort that goes into a single knitting design/pattern, is that there are so many people around right now who are capable of producing competent designs. When you think critically about how much a particular design is really worth, in dollars, it isn't a whole lot--unless the design happens to strike a chord with a lot of knitters, as did your beautiful circular cape that originally appeared on the cover of VK, and that VK recently published in an "updated" version.
The only sure way to discover if the association is for you is to join it for a year. Being raised in PA where unions are 'huge' and my grandfather was one of 5 courageous men to bring the AFLCIO into the then non-unionized White Motor Company, it is ingrained in my blood that one cannot be an island.
Hello Annie
I am really pleased to see you cover so much ground in your posting.
I am dismayed by the erosion of our ability to earn a living as designers, authors and workshop presenters.
The costs of maintaining ourselves are going up, while compensation is going down, down, down!
It's a constant scramble and it's really challenging!
I would love to join the AKD. Where do I sign up?
Thanks for going public on these issues!
a big hug
Noreen
It makes me sad/angry/frustrated when I read things like this. Those other designers are so short sighted when they sign the contract - don't they realize that, if all of you (or even most) refused to play by those very unfair rules, the magazines would have to be more fair? There is, of course, the problem of amateur designers who have other careers & design only for fun & see any payment as being a bonus. But I have to say that, generally speaking, I have noticed a difference in quality between their patterns & those of the pros & I don't think IK (or any other mag) would be satisfied with an issue full of amateur designs & nothing else. Anonymous might be right about an individual pattern not being worth much in terms of the immediate income a mag gets. So a fairly low payment to the designer might be unavoidable. But there is NO excuse for asking a designer to sign away all rights to her/his work. A low payment should secure the right to a single use only. If the mag wants to use that pattern again in an "updated" form or a compilation of "best of" patterns in a special issue mag or book, then they should have to negotiate another fee. Or an additional fee should be written into the original contract. You are right about it's being very much the same issue as the writers' strike. It seems to me that your analytical mind & writing ability would be great assets to AKD & I think Erica is right about it being easier to start with an organization already in place.
By the way, SO & I went to see Sweeney Todd (we had actually intended to go the same day you did but I am weather sensitive & we had a strong low coming in) & loved it as much as you did. Johnny Depp, in particular, was very, very impressive - I see Oscar nomination in his future. The little boy was also excellent & I was pleasantly surprised at Sacha Baron Cohen. and, of course, Alan Rickman is always fantastic - I am a huge fan of his.
I find this whole discussion fascinating. I have studied labor history and I would like to point out that businesses are in it to make money. They are going to do what they can to get whatever deals make the most money. It is just how it goes.
I think if designers are being treated unfairly by any publishing entity, they need to stick together to change things. How this should be done, will depend on the designers. However, it will be difficult if not everyone agrees that they are being treated unfairly.
Annie,
I was so glad to see the issue of unions and organizing come up. This country has been very tough on unions for the last 8 years, and it's time we stood up to that and reinvigorated the working world.
No offense to the poster who said AKD isn't a union, but a professional association, but if it deals with compensation and benefits, it's a union. I'm a member of the teaching "professional association" myself, and thank God it's a union. There is strength in numbers, and just the fact that there is a union is bound to attract more interest in the field, and cause people to take a serious look at what's going on.
I think that there are, in essence, 2 issues here. The first is that the publishers want to pay the least possible for the most marketing. That is their right and is how one runs a successful business. The second issue is that the aforementioned "least possible" is driven by what designers will accept. The problem I suspect, is that some designers are willing to undervalue themselves for the exposure. That is their right, however it will impact on others.
In addition, most designers are women. Society tends to socialize women to devalue or undervalue themselves and their work. I have seen it myself in my field which is NOT artistic. The fact that knitwear design IS artistic gives a much larger fluidity to the problem.
I'm not sure what the solution to the varying proce problem is, but as far as getting paid for a second publishing, that seems a no-brainer. The publisher will be making MORE money off of your intellectial property. Thus they should pay a second fee. or perhaps a larger initial fee.
HI Annie, just wanted to say thanks for being willing to open up conversation. I'm kinda in the middle of nowhere, so I don't actually get to talk to many in the business about the business, but with the magic of internet...I'm considering self-publishing my designs. After 10+ years I admit I'm tired of the submission process. It is a LOT of work to juggle designs around, and frequently dumbing things down to fit a profile(I feel nervous saying that, but there it is...). I've been through the process of a book collaboration, and frankly the thought of self-publishing and having complete control over the process and decisions and streamlining how many hands are stirring the pot is very attractive. I'm researching marketing over the web as well, and the whole blog world is a tremendous resource. Well, I'm off to read your IK brouhaha, email me if you'd like to discuss anything, Annie. Celeste Pinheiro dzonoqua65@yahoo.com
Thanks so much Annie for raising this important issue and looking at it from many interesting angles. I disagree with the person who said designs are worth little individually. How could VK and other mags exist without them? All the revenue these mags bring in comes from advertisers -- mostly yarn companies -- and neither the mags or the yarn cos could exist without beautiful patterns to showcase the yarns.
Musicians, writers and other arts related fields all have unions to protect their interests. The Guilds are thus far not doing this job.
It's true that there are many "amateurs" in the field, but many of them are professional quality designers who, for whatever reason, do not rely on the income. This is true for some of the big names in designing. I have no malice toward such people, but as they have no reason to be activists, it allows the industry to exploit all designers, and makes it near impossible for those who want to make a living at it.
Those with guts, like you Annie, speak out and don't go along with situations that are beneath their dignity. I wish there were more like you!
Dora
Annie,
I think it's a great idea, since it seems to me that designing is such an individual experience it's hard to develop collective power.
Would designers perhaps be already able to join the National Writer's Union which is affiliated with the UAW and represents freelance, book and technical writers?
As I looked around the web for information on how to start a union, one of the things I hadn't thought of is who exactly is on the other side of the table?
If you write for TV, then it's the network. If you're an auto worker, it's the company.
Well, for knitwear designers, who is it?
The magazine editors, the book publishers, the conference directors...
So, perhaps that is a match with other freelance artists whose work is marketed to print publishers.
Were you designing for the clothing industry, it would be a different market and a different union.
I find it sad that creativity is treated like the ugly step-child. I posted a response to a post similar to this just yesterday. Maybe there is something drastic that needs to be addressed, is that a union? I do not know. But, perhaps it is, as unions were created to protect the taken advantage of worker.
How awful that this is happening in the fiber industry.
I always enjoy your blog, but today's was even better. You are SO right. I, as a knitter, am careful to use a pattern ONLY if I am paying for it. I will not share my patterns with friends (to their annoyance, because I have a good "library"). You should not feel that you have to give in, cave in or fear the retribution (hell, sp??) of magazines or other sources. If they do you wrong, post it. We'll be behind you!
BRAVO Annie
Thank you for putt it out there in an intelligent, concise manner ---
Celebrate your gifts, talent and ideas... and be compensated properly for them!
Happy New Year!
Much love,
Anne
I love your courage.
i love that you are willing to talk about the 'taboo'.
I think there are many many factors that are at play --re-reading something Stephanie Pearl-McFee said, people question retreats, and fairs, and the money (spend on knitting) but no one questions the money spent on box seats or season passes to Hockey (or any other sport)
no questions fishing trips, (or yet another Rod (this one is carbon fiber!) or the price of fishing zines, or even fishing shows on cable. NO matter how expensive.
but knitting? every one questions why spend money on knitting?
and this undervaluing of women and womens work, and woman's hobbies (OK, its not just women who knit, nor is it just men who fish, or buy seasons tickets to sports arenas) but men do predominate in sports related activity, and women do predominate in knitting)is a systematic problem..
it goes beyond you, and IWK, and it's going on all the time.
(don't even mention to me, (i get so irate!) the number of women who have disparaged the idea of hand knit good being sold for reasonable prices (ie price that reflect minimum wages being paid to workers who produce the goods) --The Pidge comes to mind, and the $94 gaiter on Martha Stewarts page come to mind--
SO many knitters where so NEGATIVE about someone pricing knitting at (what in any reasonable world view) fair prices.
It is a continued backlash against equality.. we women need to learn to value ourselves, and others. and then the rest of the world will too.. until then...
over on Knitters Review, there is a designer who is very self rightious about her offer to pay knitters $4 (maybe, maybe less) an hour to knit.
Obviously, the idea of paying the LEGAL MINIMUM WAGE is foreign! (after all its, just knitting!)
We need to change this basic attitude (and its sad, after being a feminist, and working for this for so many years, that there is still so much to do!) not just for knitters, but for women everywhere.
I wanted to scream a huge "Thank You, ANNIE!" from the rooftops after reading your post. Your insight and views are immensely forward. And as for that designer in KR, well, I was brought up not to say mean things behind a person's back!
=:8
This was a great post. I download free patterns off of the net, but I am also a buyer of knitting books because I want artists to get their due. I am sure IK understands your point and will work with you to see what is best and to keep featuring your work.
A Union for fiber arts folks?! Sign me up sister, I think that may not be such a bad idea.
Wasn't Johnny Depp absolutely fabulous??? When he and Alan Rickman sang "Pretty Women" I nearly wept with glee. I would love to knit Mr. Depp a sweater for his next movie. haha
So many good comments. One, though, made me think. The comment about magazines only using those "willing" to sign their new contract. That is true. Magazines can do that. But, I'm pretty sure what they are going to get is less well-known designers in their magazines. Less popular designs. With that, they will get less sales.
I am a designer (one of those less-well known ones. hee hee). Someday, I'd like to be paid for my designs. It's pioneering women like you, Annie, who will make the way for us.
Thank you.
I wish you and your family Health (especially Gerry!), happiness and prosperity (ie, getting paid what you're worth!) in the New Year.
I've been thinking for awhile that we need a knitting teachers' union. It just makes sense to have a designers' union, though maybe we should combine the two since so many designers teach and vice versa.
Too many knitting teachers get paid crap. I've seen terrible deals out there, and I've personally lost money on retreats I put together (learned a lot in the process of doing those, let me tell ya). I think if we had a union, we could use that to educate our members, get the word out if someone isn't treating someone right, and work to have a fairly standard contract.
I think this is a very important issue, one on which knitters as well as designers need to become educated. In my former life (before I became a mom), I was a computer science teacher and I made sure my curriculum included examination and discussion of software copyrights and user agreements. Even though I taught in a Christian school that served middle-class families, "sharing" software was rampant because a lot of people either do not read or do not care about the agreements. Now I am a mixed media artist and I'm confronted with copyright issues daily as I create, share and begin to sell my work. I've learned a lot because other artists have shared their sources of information on their blogs. Keep talking about this issue on your blog and bring it to the forefront in the knitting community.
Annie --
It has been a while since we have talked (about AKD or anything), but I am chairing the Education Committee for AKD. I have continued to stay involved with the organization, because I see it evolving to better meet the needs to todays designers and I know that for change to happen, you must take an active role.
Someone asked about finding more information. Our website is:
http://www.knitwear-designers.org/
The organization is in a serious transition. Although I cannot predict the future of the final outcome, I have great hope that AKD will be a "force to be recon'd with" within the hand knit industry over the next few years.
I strongly encourage you and any of your faithful readers who are interested in becoming or are already established as knitwear designers join AKD. There is strength in numbers.
Happy New Year to you and your family,
Gwen Bortner
Knitability, LLC
www.knitability.com
Join us on the only cruise for Fiber Arts Teachers Ð details at www.stitchawaytours.com
Assoc of Knitwear Designers, Inc -- Ed Comm Chair / Member
Annie,
Thanks so much for speaking out about this. Your post struck home for me.
I'm a self-publisher who makes a modest living from my patterns. Years ago, one of my patterns was published in Interweave Knits. I chose them because of their reputation for fairness and respecting designers.
I discussed the terms with the then-editor, and understood that I'd retain copyright and after their next issue came out, I would sell the pattern on my website.
Recently I was quite surprised to see my pattern as one of Interweave's free downloads. (I've been selling this pattern, wholesale and retail for several years.)
When I contacted Interweave Knits about this, I received a reply from their copyright person. She explained that although I retain the copyright to "my version" of the pattern, the fine print in their contract allows IK to publish "their version" of the pattern in any way they wish.
I wrote to the editor and pointed out that their action will not only cost me hundreds of dollars in lost income, but it certainly violates the spirit of our agreement since they understood my intention to sell the pattern after their publication.
It's a good thing I published only two patterns in magazines when I was younger and more naive.
Unfortunately for all concerned, it seems there is no longer a "good guy" magazine publisher, at least from the designer's point of view.
This must be the reason that so few innovative patterns appear in the magazines nowadays.
Self-publishing is more time-consuming than I ever imagined (leaving little time to design), but for me it's the only way to go.
Thanks again, Annie,
from a sadder but wiser pattern designer.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home